Tag Archives: os x

The Apple conundrum part 2: When Windows Attack

This is a follow up to my last post here.  If it seemed like it was a little one-sided, that’s because it was.  It was getting a little long in the tooth, so I split it into two separate entries.  If you read one, and feel the need to comment, please make sure to read both.

At the end of my last entry, I sort of bashed on the iPhone unfairly.  It’s not that I have an actual issue with the iPhone per se, but it was the best example of Apple’s “we can charge you extra for what PC user’s have had for years!” mentality.

In truth, where Mac OS shows everything that making a computer “idiot proof” can do wrong, the iPhone shows where “idiot proof” isn’t such a bad thing!  (special thanks to my friend Robert, a Mac user, for the phrase “idiot proof”).

Also this last weekend, my phone fell apart.  I’m not making that up either; part of the screen fell off and the center 5-way directional wheel peeled away, leaving a nice glue spot to press against my face.  I’ve never had a phone, much less a Motorola, suddenly do this and it was more than annoying.  Since I can’t go out and just buy a new phone (not with all the features I want, anyway) I was in a bit of a spot until some friends came to the rescue.  Welsdog and Robert both let me use their phones till I could save up for a replacement one of my own.  Since Robert’s was more advanced than Welsdog’s, I settled on it out of the two.

The “old” phone is an HTC 8525 on AT&T’s network running Windows Mobile 5.  Well, it was for about ten minutes anyway; I had the SIM unlocked to use my T-Mobile card and the ROM upgraded to Windows Mobile 6 within minutes.  I’ve used Windows based smart-phones before, and they’ve always left me wanting.  Sure, they are little powerhouses compared to most small electronics, but the interface is downright maddening!  

In a device that is going to be primarily used as a phone, I don’t want to have to use a stylus to do everything.  And I mean everything!  Answering a call should not be a chore when I have a touch screen!  You should not bury the keypad under 4 menus!  This is a phone first, and a mini computer second!  Windows has problems with that, it seems.

While waiting for my iMac to create its backup image and let me know if it was going to work or not, I started modifying the very nature of my phone’s interface.  I decided that, for all faults it might have, the iPhone interface is actually very finger friendly.  The fact that I can read and scroll through all my contacts without bringing the phone up to my chin was appealing to me.  After a lot of reading, experimenting, and cursing at various applications, I was able to completely transform my Windows Mobile 6 smart phone into an iPhone clone.  Only this one actually has hardware you’d want to use (and can cut & paste).

Just so we’re all up to speed on this; I made an Apple product run Windows, and made a Windows product behave like an Apple one.  But I can justify this by the type of products we’re talking about!  Apple’s OS X (as I previously pointed out) likes to treat a desktop system like it’s an electronic toy; to be reset and replaced on a whim.  That’s not how you treat an actual workstation!  That’s how you treat . . . well, an electronic toy.  Sort of like a phone.

Windows treats an electronic toy (which I’m sorry, all smart phones are, I don’t care what you use them for) like it’s just as important as your desktop computer.  It’s not!  It’s a phone!  You can reset the crap out of it and it will keep on chugging along.  You actually make backups of everything important on it every time you plug it in (kinda like a Mac!), so recovering from a massive failure literally only takes a few minutes . . . and involves resetting it and restoring from backup!

Don’t get me wrong; I like that the Windows Mobile environment is flexible and powerful enough to adapt to any situation I’m going to give it.  But like so many little devices, I’m only going to tweak it so much before I just let it be.  Can you imagine if Microsoft had used the same interface for their car-bound Sync platform?  People would die in massive pile-ups constantly!

“Sync, unlock, confirm unlock, access phone, contacts, scroll, scroll, scroll, home, main number, dial, yes.  I said yes.”

Don’t even start on how you’d access your music or directions, and that’s assuming they’d even keep the voice interface!

 

Sync: Microsoft's first true idiot-proof concept.

Sync: Microsoft's first true idiot-proof concept.

It’s not that I don’t understand or appreciate Apple’s simplified interface on a laptop or PC, I do.  I do, and I find myself enjoying it.  But it’s such a downer when you realize that the back end of the operating system isn’t any more complex than the pretty interface on top of it.

On the flip side, Windows seems intent on bringing the same “give you every option you could ever want” to its most simple devices, leaving them drowning in menus, screen taps, and endless file directories.

I can go on and on how I hate Apple’s advertisements and their pricing structures, but that really wasn’t the point of my posts.  On a design vs. design level, both Apple and Windows could learn a thing or two from each other.  In the end, one could summarize the difference between the rivals as such:

In OS X, you’ll be able to find your way and understand the entire system within moments of turning it on . . . but that’s as far as it will ever be able to take you.  You may never be able to learn all of Windows little secrets, but you’ll be able to take it farther than you ever thought you’d need to.

The Apple conundrum part 1

OK, just to be clear first and foremost; this is not to start a flame war.  I am writing this about my own experiences and observations using computers and personal electronics.  Not everyone knows computers to the same degree, so I’m going to simplify things as best I can without coming across as children’s programming.

I would tend to think that I have a little more expirience using a computer than most people.  Not all people, mind you, but most.  I own a Mac and a PC and use Windows and OS X (sometimes at the same time).  I’ve had to teach myself how to recover from any sort of system crash in Windows, and that there isn’t really a way to recover from a crash in OS X (so don’t go screwing around in there).  But it wasn’t until this last weekend that I think I might have hit upon the fundamental difference between an Apple and a PC.

PC users expect more of their machine.

I know, it sounds weird to read it, and it really sounds weird to say it.  Even most PC users have bought into the idea that a Mac is very capable and pretty but just for people who want to do specialized things.  Mac users think that PC users just like to torture themselves with unstable operating systems and complex interfaces.  And to a moderate degree, both are right.  However, each one could learn something from the other.  

This weekend I decided to increase the size of my Windows partition on my computer.  My main machine is an iMac running OS X Leopard, and I had installed Windows Vista Ultimate using BootCamp some time ago.  When I had done it, I figured I’d be using Leopard as often as I used Vista, so I gave Vista a little less than half the drive.  Fast forward to present day, and my Windows drive was nearly full.

After searching around on the forums, it seemed there was no definitive way to re-size the drive partition.  Long time Mac users suggested simply blowing away the Windows installation and starting over.  Long time Windows users were aghast at such a suggestion.  No middle ground could be found.

After much searching and reading, I came across a method that involved saving an image of my Windows partition to an external disc (hopefully ensuring nothing was lost) and wiping out the partition.  After 5 hours of working, the image was complete and the Windows partition was no more.  I launched BootCamp again and told it to create a new Windows drive, this time giving vista 95% of the drive.  It churned for some time before telling me it couldn’t . . . something about files in the wrong place.

I panicked.  Sure, my Windows image was secure on my external drive, but what good was that if I couldn’t access any of it?!  The exact error message even suggested that I blow away my Leopard installation and start the whole computer from scratch.  After a LOT of searching online, it became very clear that most other Apple aficionados didn’t find this a bit odd in the slightest; if that’s what the error message said to do, there’s no reason not to do it!

At some point, an explanation came up as to why the computer was having a fit.  It would appear that after I installed Vista, Leopard just started saving files willy-nilly all over the drive.  Now that I wanted to resize the drive, Leopard couldn’t handle that because some files were sitting in the space I was wanting to use!

The average user is either scratching their head right now, or stopped reading this awhile ago.  The average PC tech is thinking, “No biggie . . . just defrag the drive!”  Except Leopard doesn’t have a defragment utility!  According to Apple, the OS does it automatically without ever involving you.  Of course, they lie, since everyone on the Apple forums who runs into this problem is surprised to find that their drive is heavily fragmented.

The solution?  Either wipe out the entire computer and start over (as the error message told me to) or buy a 3rd party program to do a task that the OS should have had included.  Long story short (too late!), I was able to get everything redone just right (more than doubling the space that Vista has available to it) without resorting to a full format of my machine.

How does this relate to my observation at the beginning of this post?  Well it sort of came to me when everyone on the Apple forums and Support were telling me to go ahead and format my machine and reinstall from CD.  When I explained that I really didn’t feel like reinstalling everything I had ever done, they asked me why hadn’t I ever done a backup.  It’s apparently expected of people that if they are going to buy a Mac, then you are also going to buy a backup drive, because there is no way to recover from system errors than to format the sucker!  

PC users expect more of their machines: They expect them not to crash and lose everything you might have done and swallow it into the Void, never to be accessed again.  They expect to have the ability to upgrade the system past its original specs, and not have to scrap the whole thing to buy the latest model (and migrate their files with the obligatory backups they’ve been creating).  They expect to walk into an electronics store and have everything in the store work with their system!

Meanwhile, Apple still touts normal funtions like they are revolutionary!  A perfect case in point is the newest iPhone ads, going something like this:

This is how you play music on it.  This is how you can play games.  This is how you can read your email, texts, and the internet on it.  This is how you use it to get directions.  This is how you can even find and download new applications.  And this is when you realize . . . IT’S ALMOST LIKE YOUR PC!!!

I made up that last part, but I think you get the idea.

 

Part two for tomorrow.

QR Code Business CardStop SOPA